Home › Forums › Costa Rica Living Forum › Setting up a company to hold each car??
- This topic has 1 reply, 6 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by hones1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2011 at 12:00 am #160112hones1Member
Distributing assets amongst various entities to reduce the risk of one accident bringing the whole corporation down is a well known tactic for larger corporations.
We are a small corporation, but have been advised that we should set up a separate corporation (SA) to hold not just our fleet of cars (currently a “fleet” of two!) but to hold each car separately.
I am all for protecting our assets, but this seems like a lawyer making work for themselves?
Any thoughts?
May 23, 2011 at 7:11 pm #160113AndrewKeymasterI only own one car but certainly have it in the name of a corporation…
If I had two cars I would certainly have each of them owned by a different corporation.
It’s just one of the insane games we have to play if we want to protect our assets…
Scott
May 23, 2011 at 11:16 pm #160114smekulyMember[quote=”Scott”]I only own one car but certainly have it in the name of a corporation…
If I had two cars I would certainly have each of them owned by a different corporation.
It’s just one of the insane games we have to play if we want to protect our assets…
Scott[/quote]
scott
that strategy will soon cost you and additional $300 per year per S.A.
May 23, 2011 at 11:21 pm #160115hones1MemberWhat is the $300 for (I assume a tax, so I mean what is the name of that tax.) Tks
May 23, 2011 at 11:21 pm #160116AndrewKeymasterI have interests in dozens of different companies so yes an additional $300 per year will hurt a little “if” indeed it is passed.
As you well know, there have been many, many different proposals over the years and rarely do they come into play in the same way as they were originally proposed.
“Vamos a ver!”
Scott
May 23, 2011 at 11:23 pm #160117AndrewKeymaster[quote=”hones1″]What is the $300 for (I assume a tax, so I mean what is the name of that tax.) Tks[/quote]
This is a PROPOSED tax only, it is not in effect as yet! We will certainly be writing more about it should it be approved.
Scott
May 24, 2011 at 1:18 am #160118waggoner41Member[quote=”smekuly”]
that strategy will soon cost you and additional $300 per year per S.A.[/quote]I have two cars and a property and will gladly pay the tax IF it becomes law.
I would rather not have everything I own tied up in a court suit if anything goes awry.May 24, 2011 at 12:06 pm #160119Disabled VeteranMemberI currently have one corporation for my house, and another for my SUV. I will soon be getting a third, for my sailboat. I consider the possibility of paying $300.00 for each, a small price to pay for protection of my assets!
May 24, 2011 at 1:58 pm #160120DavidCMurrayParticipantWe have our home and our car in separate corporations, too. For one thing, when it’s time to sell, we’ll sell the stock in the corporations with their respective assets but there will be no transfer tax. It’s a simplified procedure.
Of course, our liability is also limited by this approach, but I wonder just how many instances there are of major liabilities accruing to home or car owners. Does anyone actually know of an instance where a court in Costa Rica has actually found for the plaintiff and imposed a heavy liability?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.